This page is no longer maintained — Please continue to the home page at www.scala-lang.org

2.8 => 3.0

2 replies
ngarthl
Joined: 2009-07-19,
User offline. Last seen 34 weeks 4 days ago.
It seems like there are a lot of breaking changes in 2.8. (new collection api, syntax changes etc.)

Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?

Do the scala developers really want to deal with legacy already?



-- Erlend
fanf
Joined: 2009-03-17,
User offline. Last seen 2 years 30 weeks ago.
Re: 2.8 => 3.0

On 25/10/2009 18:18, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
> Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?

There was a lot of thing said on that subject lately, please see
information here before carrying along this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1685/focus=1701
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1710/focus=1734

ngarthl
Joined: 2009-07-19,
User offline. Last seen 34 weeks 4 days ago.
Re: 2.8 => 3.0
sorry, I should have searched before posting.

Thanks.

-- Erlend

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Francois <fanf42 [at] gmail [dot] com> wrote:
On 25/10/2009 18:18, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
Shouldn't it then become 3.0 instead?

There was a lot of thing said on that subject lately, please see information here before carrying along this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1685/focus=1701
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.scala.internals/1710/focus=1734

Copyright © 2012 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland