Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto standard for Scala?

I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best,
in your opinion?

Thanks,
Ken

Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto stan

Added by David Pollak on 2009-01-17, 20:47

Specs is what we use in Lift-land

On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald" <kenneth [dot] m [dot] mcdonald [at] sbcglobal [dot] net> wrote:

I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best, in your opinion?

Thanks,
Ken

Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto sta

Added by Ricky Clarkson on 2009-01-17, 21:57
I use Specs at work, for testing Java code.  Outside Lift-land.

2009/1/17 David Pollak <feeder [dot] of [dot] the [dot] bears [at] gmail [dot] com>

Specs is what we use in Lift-land

On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald" <kenneth [dot] m [dot] mcdonald [at] sbcglobal [dot] net> wrote:

I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best, in your opinion?

Thanks,
Ken

Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto sta

Added by Robert Kosara on 2009-01-17, 22:27
Got a link? "Specs" is not a very Google-friendly name ...

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ricky Clarkson <ricky [dot] clarkson [at] gmail [dot] com> wrote:
I use Specs at work, for testing Java code.  Outside Lift-land.

2009/1/17 David Pollak <feeder [dot] of [dot] the [dot] bears [at] gmail [dot] com>

Specs is what we use in Lift-land

On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald" <kenneth [dot] m [dot] mcdonald [at] sbcglobal [dot] net> wrote:

I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best, in your opinion?

Thanks,
Ken


Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto sta

Added by Steve Lianoglou on 2009-01-17, 22:37

> Got a link? "Specs" is not a very Google-friendly name ...

No, but "scala specs" is :-)

http://code.google.com/p/specs/

-steve

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ricky Clarkson > wrote:
> I use Specs at work, for testing Java code. Outside Lift-land.
>
> 2009/1/17 David Pollak
>
> Specs is what we use in Lift-land
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald" > wrote:
>
> I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best,
> in your opinion?
>
> Thanks,
> Ken

Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto sta

Added by Tim Perrett on 2009-01-18, 11:57

On this note - what coverage reporting tools are people using with specs?

Cheers, Tim

On 17/01/2009 21:28, "Steve Lianoglou"
wrote:

>> Got a link? "Specs" is not a very Google-friendly name ...
>
> No, but "scala specs" is :-)
>
> http://code.google.com/p/specs/
>
> -steve
>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ricky Clarkson >> wrote:
>> I use Specs at work, for testing Java code. Outside Lift-land.
>>
>> 2009/1/17 David Pollak
>>
>> Specs is what we use in Lift-land
>>
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald"
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best,
>> in your opinion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ken
>
>

Re: Has any Unit Testing framework emerged as the de facto sta

Added by Ricky Clarkson on 2009-01-18, 15:37
Cobertura, via Maven.

2009/1/18 Tim Perrett <hello [at] timperrett [dot] com>

On this note - what coverage reporting tools are people using with specs?

Cheers, Tim

On 17/01/2009 21:28, "Steve Lianoglou" <mailinglist [dot] honeypot [at] gmail [dot] com>
wrote:

>> Got a link? "Specs" is not a very Google-friendly name ...
...
>
> No, but "scala specs" is :-)
>
> http://code.google.com/p/specs/
>
> -steve
>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ricky Clarkson <ricky [dot] clarkson [at] gmail [dot] com
>>> wrote:
>> I use Specs at work, for testing Java code.  Outside Lift-land.
>>
>> 2009/1/17 David Pollak <feeder [dot] of [dot] the [dot] bears [at] gmail [dot] com>
>>
>> Specs is what we use in Lift-land
>>
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2009 11:27 AM, "Kenneth McDonald"
>> <kenneth [dot] m [dot] mcdonald [at] sbcglobal [dot] net
>>> wrote:
>>
>> I suspect not, but thought I'd ask. Which are the most popular/best,
>> in your opinion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ken
>
>



Copyright © 2013 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland