- About Scala
- Documentation
- Code Examples
- Software
- Scala Developers
Re: Dependency Injection
[ Ah, Tony sets a Reply-To header. Here's my reply for the whole list.]
On Wednesday 14 September 2011, Tony Morris wrote:
> ...
>
> You're talking about program composition in general here. This is the
> very thesis of functional programming.
>
> ...
Is there anything else? Is there anything _not_ subjugated to the goal
of compositionality?
I ask this because it seems that systems like ScalaZ are so utterly,
extremely single-minded in their pursuit of this notion of composition
that every other concern has been sacrificed.
Randall Schulz










Re: Dependency Injection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2011 02:07 PM, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> [ Ah, Tony sets a Reply-To header. Here's my reply for the whole list.]
>
>
> On Wednesday 14 September 2011, Tony Morris wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> You're talking about program composition in general here. This is the
>> very thesis of functional programming.
>>
>> ...
>
> Is there anything else? Is there anything _not_ subjugated to the goal
> of compositionality?
>
> I ask this because it seems that systems like ScalaZ are so utterly,
> extremely single-minded in their pursuit of this notion of composition
> that every other concern has been sacrificed.
>
>
> Randall Schulz
>
Yes. There is concession all the time.
The goal is single-minded devotion to practical application and
sacrificing from the ideal only to the extent necessary, mandated by
external influences rather by personal ignorance (which, if that
personal ignorance is the barrier, it becomes the target).